meta:comments ?
matus.uzak at gmail.com
matus.uzak at gmail.com
Thu May 3 13:12:28 BST 2012
.. but where did <meta:comments> come from? it's not part of ODF 1.2.
Should we replace it by <dc:description> in UI?
I could then take care of filters to use <dc:description> instead of
<meta:comments>.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:25 PM, C. Boemann <cbo at boemann.dk> wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2012 13:18:40 Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:41:34 AM matus.uzak at gmail.com wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > why do we use the <meta:commetns> el. across filters and support it in
>> > KoDocumentInfo.cpp and friends? LO and MSOffice use the
>> > <dc:description> el. instead and it's content seems to be unused in
>> > calligra.
>>
>> As far as I can see we have in the ui the field comments and no field for
>> description. I think those are separate fields and it might be possible to
>> support both.
>>
>> Please note that dc:description is read and saved back to the document if
>> it is in there. However currently it is not shown somewhere in the UI.
>>
>> Thorsten
>> _______________________________________________
>> calligra-devel mailing list
>> calligra-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
> Ok let's have it then
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
More information about the calligra-devel
mailing list