Using the Tables brand/trade name for a spreadsheet application
Thorsten Zachmann
t.zachmann at zagge.de
Thu Mar 8 04:59:50 GMT 2012
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 05:16:11 Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote:
> On Thursday, March 08, 2012 04:36:25 AM Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> > On 03/07/2012 06:10 PM, Algot Runeman wrote:
> > > On 03/07/2012 09:15 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> > >>> I really think we should not rename to Abacus if we do not plan to
> > >>> make some lawyers even more rich.
> > >>
> > >> Maybe we should just go for the most generic names possible, like
> > >> Calligra Sheets or even Calligra Spreadsheet. Spreadsheet is such a
> > >> generic word that nobody can claim it.
> > >>
> > >> Boudewijn
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> calligra-devel mailing list
> > >> calligra-devel at kde.org
> > >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
> > >
> > > As a user, I like this one, too.
> > > Calligra Spreadsheet
> >
> > I like Calligra Sheets which is even shorter, close to what is does and
> > while it's rather generic there is no such big danger other apps are
> > using it in there UI to describe something else.
> >
> > Would "Spreadsheet" pass those "the name should be short, 1-3
> > syllables" idea formulated in the first discussion when Calligra was
> > formed? If yes, I think that's for sure a nice and matching one too :)
>
> I think Calligra Sheets is also the best suggestion I've heard so far. So I
> would say we should just go for that.
Looks like Mek has found a new name and I agree that Calligra Sheets is a nice
one. We should make sure to say it is Calligra Sheets as otherwise maybe some
people come again and say they already use Sheets as a spreadsheets
application name.
Thorsten
More information about the calligra-devel
mailing list