a new library

[C. Boemann]

On Wednesday 19 December 2012 11:36:36 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 10:41, Inge Wallin <inge at lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> > All this said, I think a refactor could be a good idea. But why not make
> > a meaningful name? libflaketools should be obvious enough; alpine is 
> > justa bit too clever for me.
> 
> +1 for any obvious name
> 
> please note the case of libprison - a barcode lib that is not even
> used by kbarcode - I don't know perhaps because of the clever but
> misleading name ;)
Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a generic 
name that describes the library very well ( and no flaketools doesn't unless we 
wan to have many such similarly named libraries) and so when i wrote the mail 
that was just a codename that sprung to mind.