Feature plans for 2.4 and 2.5

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 Apr, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> I wonder if the current format of features plan should be kept. The reason
> we use the current format is that we had soft freezes (when no new features
> are started), so we needed a way to keep track on what needed to be
> finished.
> 
> To me it would seem better to have a singe page, with the following
> information: description, branch name, status (planing, in progress,
> merged), expected delivery date/version, and merge hash.
> 
> When we branch, we take everything that is marked as done, put it in the
> changelog.
> 

I like this plan.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl