Review Request: formulas averageif, averageifs, sumifs, countifs implemented in Calligra Sheets

Nityam Vakil nityam.vakil at gmail.com
Thu Apr 5 02:22:56 BST 2012



> On April 5, 2012, 1:06 a.m., Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote:
> > One thing I'd really like to have before this goes in is unit tests. Currently (almost?) every function has several unit tests to test for correctness, so I don't really want new functions that get added to not have at least some basic unit tests.

Ok. I'll write unit tests for the formulas.


- Nityam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104487/#review12176
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 5, 2012, 12:56 a.m., Nityam Vakil wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104487/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 5, 2012, 12:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Calligra.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> To fully support all of the defined heighest level 4 formulas, I added support for formulas averageif, averageifs, sumifs, countifs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   sheets/ValueCalc.h d0018c2 
>   sheets/ValueCalc.cpp 7e6f3a3 
>   sheets/functions/math.cpp d57ce94 
>   sheets/functions/statistical.cpp 020b03e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104487/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've tested above formulas with some test data attached here. And it seems to be working fine.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nityam Vakil
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20120405/8dd3d276/attachment.htm>


More information about the calligra-devel mailing list