New logo

[Cyrille Berger Skott]

On Thursday 03 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Eugene provided the artwork to use, with kind words "do whatever you
> want with it".
> As for the LGPL part of: if we collectively agree for the license, it
> can be official from today (if we agree to be really informal).
> But just a though: since the Sprint is just in one week maybe you
> could delay usage of the logo on that distribution or web page so we
> can make final decision on both topics (artwork, logo/trademark)
> during the meeting. The outcome would be then one of the news from the
> sprint.
> You could use generic Calligra Suite text until then instead (or is
> this a big problem?).
LGPL is really a bad idea for artwork... I would suggest CC-BY-SA, which is 
basically like LGPL but for artwork:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott