KDE git workflow

[Cyrille Berger]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:01:13PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 21:18:49 PM Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> > Well, sounds really really familiar. They could have attended our sprint
> > and spared the discussion time, couldn't they? ;)
> > IIRC this very workflow was already discussed in Oslo.
> 
> I'll believe it when I see 0 failing tests and all document round-tripping 
> without errors. ;-)
> 
> Seriously, I think we can get there if we set up a system where a patch can go 
We have discussed this at the last sprint in Berlin, the idea is that developers commit in master, and the buildbot validate the commits, and if the tests are passing they are migrated to a "master-validated" branch. And if master does not pass the test suite, the migration is blocked until the problem is solved, either by a fix, or by reverting the bad commit.

And I am actually (slowly) working on the setup right now.

-- 
Cyrille Berger