taglib-extras 0.1.7 vs. taglib 1.6

[Michael Schwendt]

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:38:47 -0400, Jeff wrote:

> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:01:52 -0400, Jeff wrote:
> > 
> >> (WAV is in a different namespace, so technically it's not even a problem.)
> > 
> > Once again, only if you work around it in Amarok, because the include
> > directory structure of both taglib and taglib-extras is _flat_.
> > The two libs share the same header names and even preprocessor variable
> > names, such as TAGLIB_WAVFILE_H, with taglib-extras headers including
> > taglib headers.
> 
> I don't see why this is something that you are complaining about. If we
> need to work around such a thing in Amarok by fixing our includes, so what?

Dunno who made you think that I'm complaining and why it would matter
whether I complain or simply point out some things.