Q: dynamic playlist of unrated songs

Gary Steinert gary.steinert at gmail.com
Mon Jun 29 19:50:07 UTC 2009


On Monday 29 June 2009 18:22:20 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> What's really happening here is that some people make an (incorrect)
> assumption that zero is a valid rating.  It isn't clear either way that
> this is or isn't the case.  What the question really boils down to is: what
> will be less confusing to most people -- no stars = not rated, or no
> stars = zero rating?
Could we not (talking from a visual side here) give some indication to the 
user that the track is unrated other than having no stars. The first idea that 
comes to mind is simply writing 'Unrated' across the stars (see the attached 
screenshot) This would remove any ambiguity and allow people to rate a track 0 
stars.

Also, just to give a scenario when 0 stars would be useful. I, more often than 
not, get music by the album, and I hate having incomplete albums in my 
collection (no idea why, just really annoys me =P). So every once in a while I 
get an awesome album with a track I absolutely hate. I dont want to remove it 
from my collection because its part of the album, but I would rate it 0, 
rather than 1 which suggests I actually like something about it =P.
-- 
Gary Steinert -  Your object is to save the world, while still leading a 
pleasant life.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: UnratedStars.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5428 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090629/665754cd/attachment.png>


More information about the Amarok mailing list