Q: dynamic playlist of unrated songs
D. R. Evans
doc.evans at gmail.com
Mon Jun 29 14:18:55 UTC 2009
Ben K said the following at 06/28/2009 07:22 PM :
> Actually the last time I looked at the source, an unrated song IS the same
> as a zero rating. The DB stores unrated songs' rating as zero, but it should
> probably be null. If people are happy for this to change I'll see if I can
> write a patch tonight.
Yes; it is conceptually completely different to say "I have formed no
opinion about this song" than to say "My opinion of this song is that is
worthless".
Reading later in this thread, I am astounded that there is any debate about
this. The concepts are totally different.
For example, If I ask "What is the cardinality of set X?" then the answer
"zero" is profoundly different from the answer "I don't know".
(Or to give an example closer to home: if someone asks me "How many people
use amarok?", would the answer "zero" be acceptable?)
So, no matter how it is implemented, there should be a way to distinguish a
zero rating from "unrated".
I thought that was what the <blank> option was intended to do when
filtering according to rating, but apparently that's not so. It's not at
all obvious what the <blank> option is there for.
Doc
--
Web: http://www.sff.net/people/N7DR
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090629/8436d4df/attachment.sig>
More information about the Amarok
mailing list