[Feedback] What did you do with Amarok?

[Oscar<Soker>]

jajajajajaaj you people have real problems with examples, well maybe my
examples are bad ones, anyway  what I want to say is that as a community we
must give ideas, advices, solutions or any kind of help to developpers
instead of just complain, what Casey wrote on her summary is perfect

And if no sound is coming out of your speakers, it's not an Amarok
> problem anyways :-)


yes if amarok does not use correctly its backend :P (again just an example)

Atentamente Oscar:



On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jeff Mitchell <mitchell at kde.org> wrote:

> Tim Bocek wrote:
> > LOn Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Oscar<Soker> <sokerlp at gmail.com
> > <mailto:sokerlp at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     yeap, I wanted to point my personal opinion, but there are most
> >     important things than others imagine some day  you want to listen
> >     music and for some unknown reason no sound comes out of your
> >     speakers but you can see that developpers put their effort
> >     improving  the little icon on the top of the window, I mean is their
> >     time but most users preffer to use amarok as a Music Player, because
> >     I think that's what amarok is
> >
> >
> > If all you care about is "music coming out of your speakers", then
> > konsole + mpg123 is a perfectly good solution.  So, clearly what Amarok
> > offers is a little more than just "music playing".  This returns to the
> > question of "What extras in addition to music playing", which brings us
> > right back to Leo's point.
>
> And if no sound is coming out of your speakers, it's not an Amarok
> problem anyways :-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090728/4d367c7e/attachment.html>