amarok 1.4

Jeff Mitchell mitchell at kde.org
Fri Jul 17 18:44:03 UTC 2009


Ralf Jung wrote:
> Am Freitag 17. Juli 2009 00:01:21 schrieb Jeff Mitchell:
>> Ralf Jung wrote:
>>> described this in a bug report at
>>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191705, trying to do constructive
>>> criticism, but that was obviously not welcome.
>> Don't be melodramatic.
>>
>> I just looked at the bug report again. There was nothing "unwelcome" in
>> it, just pointers to a blog post that had been written on that topic.
> I am not. I already knew that blog posting (which of course Seb could not 
> know), and it did not help much - the new custom layout manager is by far not 
> as easy to use as the old table. His reaction clearly showed that the 
> suggestion I made was not welcome

The fact that a particular piece of constructive criticism was not acted
on does not mean that the developers do not care about what you think,
nor does it mean that any and all constructive criticism is unwelcome.
And it's "INVALID" -- in all caps -- because we have a limited number of
items we can choose from (and all of them are all in caps). I could
change it to WONTFIX if it will make you feel better.

You need to stop taking this personally. You're reading too much into
the resolution of the bug.

For the record -- one reason it was closed was because we have received
other, very similar complaints and will act on them if and when we have
the time/inclination. As a result, there wasn't much point in keeping it
open. We have a ton of things we're working on, and a ton of things on
our plate, and for now we want to continue improving the new playlist. I
don't honestly know if we'll get the spreadsheet style playlist back,
but please rest assured that your (and others') preferences for it are
not forgotten.

Thanks,
Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090717/286eb754/attachment.sig>


More information about the Amarok mailing list