Importing collection data from 1.4 to 2.2.0
Chris Joelly
chris-m-lists at joelly.net
Sat Dec 19 12:17:28 UTC 2009
Hi,
thanks for your effort :) but i switched to Exaile because Amarok2 has
some other serious bugs and usability problems which i found annoying.
Chris
On Mit, Dez 16, 2009, Alan Ezust wrote:
> Doh.
> make that
>
> http://lazarus.homelinux.net/share/ratingMigrate.tar.gz
>
> :-)
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Alan Ezust <alan.ezust at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Forget the last e-mail, with the attachment. Here is a URL to a better
> tarball that contains a readme too.
>
> http://localhost/share/ratingMigrate.tar.gz
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Alan Ezust <alan.ezust at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When I upgraded from 1.4 to 2.2, I think i tried every possible
> combination of copy/import/rescan and never got ratings in properly.
>
> So I wrote another program that scanned my 1.4 db and inserted the
> missing ratings into a 2.2 db.
> I was kinda curious to know how the new schema differed in any case.
>
> I will attach the code that did it to this e-mail. I hope it helps some
> others too.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Chris Joelly <chris-m-lists at joelly.net
> > wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> i have upgraded to 2.2.0 and finally get used to the new version ;)
>
> but i have a question regarding importing the data from 1.4:
>
> i thought that "Importing collection" will import all data from my
> previous collection, but, as i read a thread from october on this
> list
> this is not the case. I catched on that thread that i have to
> rescan my
> collection from filesystem in any case.
>
> So, if i understood if correct, the best way to import the data is:
>
> 1. scan the filesystem
> 2. import the statistics
>
> hm. in 1.4 i used mysql to store data about my collection. and i
> want to
> use mysql again with 2.2.
>
> how to deal with the database issue in this context?
>
> the 1.4 scheme seems to be updated and useless for 2.2, so i can
> safely
> throw away the 1.4 db and create a new one for 2.2? I think no, the
> old
> db is needed for accessing parts of the old statistics?
>
> but i have to create a new database for the 2.2 db scheme upfront
> and
> configure the connection details before point 1, scanning the
> filesystem?
>
> is this the way the upgrade w.r.t the statistics should work
> smoothly?
>
> thx
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
More information about the Amarok
mailing list