talk about screwing the pooch!

Jeff Mitchell mitchell at kde.org
Tue Aug 18 11:52:27 UTC 2009


Colin Guthrie wrote:
> The blame is quite firmly in the distro court here.
> 
> Now obviously it's all a vicious circle as half-knowledgable users will 
> ask (quite strongly) that their distro includes App X @ version Y in the 
> distro. Perhaps 2.0 should have stayed at 1.99.x for longer, perhaps 
> this would have discouraged said users, but at the end of the day the 
> distro people should be familiar enough with a project to know when it's 
> a good idea to ship any new version as the default version available to 
> users.

And to be fair to us, our release information stated that the 2.0
release was for early adopters/advanced users/testers. Most distros took
the hint and waited until 2.1 to make Amarok 2 the default. (The *why*
of why we released 2.0 instead of staying pre-2.0 longer has been
covered extensively on this list, so search the archives if you are
interested.)

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090818/5fc33835/attachment.sig>


More information about the Amarok mailing list