Stable DCOP Interface For Listing Collection Contents?

[Max Howell]

> Well, a good thing about XML is that it's, umm, extensible :-)
>
> It seems like you should be able to add possible fields without breaking
> things as long as you don't take any fields away.  But outputting in XML
> *does* provide a standard way to parse, which would be nice if people (i.e.
> script writers) want to do things with this.  So I'd say XML++ too, but
> that's just my opinion...

Anyway, if I do XML, I'll go for a very simple markup, so I'll
instantly limit the future of these functions, but if I stick to
something crap someone will hate it and design a decent XML format
based on whatever my crap evolves into.

However I'll do XML as whatever you guys want really.

Can we version these functions? As that way it's easy to improve them
and keep backwards compatibility.

Max