Some ideas for Amarok 2.0 based on foobar2k experience

Mark Kretschmann markey at
Tue Nov 14 21:20:31 UTC 2006

On Tuesday 14 November 2006 22:10, Michael Pujos wrote:

> So you can see these features are invaluable for building arbitrary UI.
> I really think amarok 2.0 should'nt impose a static UI, but provide a
> sensible default UI based on default plugins.
> That would totally rock if experienced user could experiment with other
> UI to satisfy their need, and propose it to others for download.
> Note that fb2k is known to run with wine, and it can be used to test UI
> design without writing a line of code (well, until you get into TAGZ
> that is)

Ultra high configurability is absolutely not what we are striving for. I 
believe it's the task of the developer to provide a good GUI, not the user's.


More information about the Amarok mailing list