USB hdd support

[Andrew Turner]

In my opinion, the device could be just another attribute for the
Group By in the Collection Browser. That way, you could just see an
uninterrupted list of artists, or you could see it by device and then
artist. This would again present another reason to mandate naming your
devices (something I think would be necessary for you to ever be able
to remove a device from your collection anyway).

Andrew

On 01/06/06, Jeff Mitchell <kde-dev at emailgoeshere.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 31 May 2006 13:05, Maximilian Kossick wrote:
> > Sorry, of course the unique value is the primary key in the ATF table. The
> > filename is the primary key in both the statistics and tags table. That's
> > why I called it primary key, but it's obviously just a foreign key in the
> > ATF table. I'll change the wording on the wiki page.
>
> Err, not obviously.  Perhaps it *should* be a foreign key in the ATF table,
> but as I know approximately f***all about SQL, I just set it up in a basic
> way.  So there are no foreign keys on the ATF table, just the indexes, and
> the uniqueid field is declared UNIQUE (so is probably the primary key?)  :-)
>
> > Concerning "User-defined labels", I have nothing to add to what Andrew
> > wrote below. What he wrote is exactly what I meant by it.
>
> Okay.  I've been thinking that you'd have a way to view all tracks in the
> database, and then subsets, like, all those from daap, or all those from your
> iPod.  In which case you could theoretically treat it like a label in the
> Gmail style, if you wanted...might be interesting to consider.  But yes,
> user-named sources are good too!
>
> --Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>