Dynamic Collections + AFT issues
Jeff Mitchell
kde-dev at emailgoeshere.com
Sun Dec 3 09:47:29 UTC 2006
A lot of people have been complaining about seeing errors like this on every
single file in their collection:
amarok: [CollectionDB] [WARNING!] Already-scanned file
at /mnt/shared/Current Media/CDs/Classical/Richard Strauss/London
Philharmonic Orchestra/Richard Strauss - London Philharmonic Orchestra - 11 -
Four Last Songs - Fruhling.mp3 has same UID as new file at ./Current
Media/CDs/Classical/Richard Strauss/London Philharmonic Orchestra/Richard
Strauss - London Philharmonic Orchestra - 11 - Four Last Songs - Fruhling.mp3
amarok: [CollectionDB] [WARNING!] Already-scanned file
at /mnt/shared/Current Media/CDs/Classical/Richard Strauss/London
Philharmonic Orchestra/Richard Strauss - London Philharmonic Orchestra - 12 -
Four Last Songs - September.mp3 has same UID as new file at ./Current
Media/CDs/Classical/Richard Strauss/London Philharmonic Orchestra/Richard
Strauss - London Philharmonic Orchestra - 12 - Four Last Songs -
September.mp3
If you'll notice, the difference between the "already-scanned file" and
the "new file" are that the prefixes are different -- the previous prefix was
nothing and the new one is /mnt/shared.
What's happening is that AFT finds the UID and does a stat to see if the file
is still at the other location. The stat is done on the absolute path, so it
works, and AFT hits a case where it essentially thinks it sees two copies of
the same file.
I'm confused as to why this happens, because AFAIK when dynamic collections
changes a device id, it should update the tables. I don't know under what
conditions the device ID changed, either -- the file has stayed in the same
place.
Anyways, I'm looking for input on solutions. On the AFT side, if the new
location and old location have the same absolute path, instead of stat-ing, I
could just do the update (including with the new url and deviceid), and only
do the stat if the absolute paths of the new and old locations differ. But
before I commit to that, I was hoping to get some input as to why this
situation can occur -- why the ID would change, and why the database isn't
being updated if it should be -- to see if maybe the fix should lie in
dynamic collection code instead, in case this could be affecting other areas
(I have some weird problem with it saving statistics too, which I think may
be related).
--Jeff
More information about the Amarok
mailing list