Only xine? why?

[Paul Cifarelli]

and. as indicated on irc by Ian, Leo and myself, I dont think its
ready.  Its  not bad, but it doesnt live up to our standards.

Anyone who knows how to enable it is exactly who we want to do so.  At
this point in its maturity, we think this is the proper amount of exposure.

Perhaps 1.4.3 we'll enable it, but we (I :) have to make some more
progress on the existing bugs.

Paul


Ian Monroe wrote:
> On 8/19/06, Torgil Svensson <torgil.svensson at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I've tested compiling with GStreamer engine and it seems to work fine.
>> Please apply attached patches so that people can test this during the
>> beta session. A few features (f.i. crossfade) doesn't work but I see
>> no reason not to enable this.
>>
>> Why is "HTTP Proxy for Streaming"  and  "Audio CD Configuration"
>> settings grouped under the Xine engine?
>>     
>
> Because those are Xine specific options. Xine probably should be setup
> to use the KDE proxy settings, but it currently doesn't do so.
>
> Its Paul the Gstreamer's maintainer's judgement that its currently
> disabled. It has several open bugs in the bugzilla.
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3323 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20060819/cc5eb55d/attachment.bin>