as a matter of fact

[Jocke Andersson]

Sorry, I've been busy with work (and coding Amarok) most part of the week, and 
when I first saw the draft earlier today (the tinyurl's in #rokymotion's 
topic are NOT helping, you don't know what the url is about) I would have 
approved it right away. Then I lost track of time watching a movie and 
suddenly it was now o' clock.

My suggestion would be to bring back those meetings. We've had no meeting at 
all since we dcided to drop the schedule, and since then I've been knowing 
less and less about what promotional stuff has been going on (again, the 
tinyurl's are NOT helping, I don't have time to check them all out). OK, 
everybody didn't show up on those meetings, but those who did came up with 
good stuff. (I know I was busy on the last two or three, but school was 
killing me at the time.)

What do you think about that?

//Firetech

On Sunday July 2 2006 23:57, Harald Sitter wrote:
> So let me sum-up who worked on the 1.4.1 release news:
> * Hydrogen
> * Markey
> * Me, Myself and I
>
> Considering only 2 are roKymoters (ot ouf 10 named at the frontpage of rpn)
> I'm kinda sad.
>
> So I want to know how the hell can 8 people have more important stuff to do
> at the same time (which is 7 days)?
>
> Anyway, actually the answer doesn't really matter, everyone who thinks that
> he might be in wrong place @ http://rokymotion.pwsp.net shall please remove
> his name.
>
> Everyone else shall please suggest how to get more people work on
> roKymotion stuff.
> Pre-Announce release?
> Do weekly news letters for work to be done/already done?
> Yet another call for members?
>
> Really, I don't see the point of a team which consists of 2 people.