Review Request: MetaFile::Track: only provide statistics stored in tags
Matěj Laitl
matej at laitl.cz
Mon Sep 24 14:40:10 UTC 2012
> On Sept. 24, 2012, 8:46 a.m., Bart Cerneels wrote:
> > ChangeLog, line 17
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106550/diff/1/?file=86926#file86926line17>
> >
> > Is that Czech english? ;)
> > "instead of keeping then in the database."
Yes, sorry, too late in the night.
- Matěj
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106550/#review19376
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Sept. 23, 2012, 11:39 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106550/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 23, 2012, 11:39 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Amarok.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> MetaFile::Track: only provide statistics stored in tags
>
> As agreed in Randa that non-collection tracks shouldn't use external
> tables to store statistics. When user doesn't enable writing stats to
> files, we don't even read them in order not to annoy the user.
>
> Also clean up the setter methods in Meta::Track, code sharing+++
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> ChangeLog 7b58b74eae5f496dc714a78398133e7c08dd96fb
> src/core-impl/meta/file/File.h 650c79d0f3c6af581c117f33382095db5018c63f
> src/core-impl/meta/file/File.cpp a3ca501449590d2f43a30a9b288cf51089515bff
> src/core-impl/meta/file/File_p.h d29d0948047407d5798dd98a21fd75a8f66223f7
> tests/core-impl/meta/file/TestMetaFileTrack.cpp 6ee7f3c7e79dd1c18caa3549669c670dc3502686
> tests/core/meta/TestMetaTrack.h 5eb49f0f73266542efb19065cda5acf57be44acc
> tests/core/meta/TestMetaTrack.cpp 68bc84f8e6fc3efa6d6c5fd74e41808d01edd5af
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106550/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Works. This is an implementation of what has been agreed on on the requirements/architecture meetings. Running this through review to make sure we all want this.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matěj Laitl
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20120924/ef824abc/attachment.html>
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list