Review Request: {Smb, Nfs}DeviceHandler: use Solid instead of KMountPoint

[Bart Cerneels]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106094/#review17733
-----------------------------------------------------------


I'll test if this solves my blocking problem when mounted NFS is inaccessible as well.

- Bart Cerneels


On Aug. 19, 2012, 10:52 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106094/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 19, 2012, 10:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> {Smb,Nfs}DeviceHandler: use Solid instead of KMountPoint
> 
> KMountPoint seems to be unreliable and not working at least for smb
> shares. Use Solid's NetworkShare for the same task, which is much more
> *cough* ... solid. :-)
> 
> Server name & share name extraction changed a bit, but I've tested it
> to give the same names as the old implementation. (not for some corner
> cases, but old behaviour could be considered bogus there)
> 
> BUG: 302837
> FIXED-IN: 2.7
> REVIEW: 106094
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 302837.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302837
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/core-impl/collections/db/sql/device/nfs/NfsDeviceHandler.cpp 74e19bc643d15f0f1473da7a6ca52a31583ffd83 
>   src/core-impl/collections/db/sql/device/smb/SmbDeviceHandler.cpp 12d6c2a051f58579f1bdc69abeb7a1b0a049c5fa 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106094/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Medium, needs confirmation from bug reporter.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matěj Laitl
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20120820/fe13265d/attachment.html>