Review Request: Amarok cannot detect non-partitioned device
Ralf Engels
ralf-engels at gmx.de
Sat May 14 13:38:54 CEST 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101329/#review3314
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
The patch looks sensible and harmless.
Ship It
- Ralf
On May 10, 2011, 4:18 a.m., Matthieu Pupat wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101329/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated May 10, 2011, 4:18 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Amarok.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Fixes an issue where not partionned device will not show up in Amarok as for those devices from a solid-hardware point of view the StorageDrive and the
> StorageVolume are the same device.
>
>
> This addresses bug 272401.
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272401
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/core-impl/collections/umscollection/support/UmsConnectionAssistant.cpp 5956a2b
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101329/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Tested against 2.4.0.90 as I was unable to build the git repository.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matthieu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20110514/71b2d109/attachment.htm
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list