Review Request: MusicBrainz Tagger "restyling"

Stefan Derkits stefan at derkits.at
Tue Nov 2 09:23:53 CET 2010



> On 2010-11-01 19:21:36, Stefan Derkits wrote:
> > The Colours in the Screenshot look a little bit strange (especially this really light blue) and could need some Refinement
> > And the Selection which Set of Tags to use should maybe be made by selecting it, instead of using checkboxes (because you can only select one tagset)
> > otherwise a good Improvement :)
> 
> Sergey Ivanov wrote:
>     I tried to make gradient Red->Green ( through orange ), but It looked terrible, that's why  I dropped blue color component. Color for MusicDNS was taken "from a roof", It's a simple Qt::cyan. They all can be changed, i.e. waiting for your advices. :)
>     I think that checkboxes much more clear for understanding of selection precess then simple row selection, and It prevents from: "WTF happened with my tags, I didn't mean to accept this crap!?"
>     Btw mass-selection still available by clicking on a first header column, It automatically select all top results, except tracks that already has result selected by user.
> 
> Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
>     Looks good so far. But checkboxes are definitely the wrong control if only one can be selected. Is it possible to use radio buttons?
>     The mass selection sounds like a useful feature, although I'd have to see it in action to see if it can be understood.

Maybe another Idea would be to use no Colour. First, because it's hard to find Colours that look good in every Colour Scheme and second because a small percentage of Colour Blind Users can't see them. So maybe instead of using Colours, make an additional Collumn where you show the "Similarity Ratio" as a numerical Value. Does MusicDNS not support any kind of Information "how good the Results are"?


- Stefan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100127/#review261
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2010-11-01 18:35:41, Sergey Ivanov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100127/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-11-01 18:35:41)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Rebuild MBT dialog. Now search result presented by a Tree, trackToSearch->SearchResults. Search results sorted by similarity ratio ( more similar is on top ), and has different colors corresponding to that. MusicDNS search results marked with a cyan color and stay on bottom. There is no Start search button any more, both searches run simultaneously.
> 
> Will be Implemented soon:
> 1) If one TrackID founded by both searches, this result automatically moves on top.
> 2) MB icon linked to track page on musicbrainz.org. //need to find a place for It
> 3..n Needs your advices. :)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 2abeca2 
>   src/dialogs/MusicBrainzTagger.h e33c9f6 
>   src/dialogs/MusicBrainzTagger.cpp cdc3ec5 
>   src/dialogs/MusicBrainzTagger.ui 3f14236 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzFinder.h 49c8f6b 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzFinder.cpp 41ddbaa 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzMeta.h 57ed363 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzTagsModel.h a93929a 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzTagsModel.cpp 1bf7389 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzTrackListModel.h 6eaa648 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzTrackListModel.cpp fa1fc10 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicDNSFinder.h 2cd00d1 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicDNSFinder.cpp 9c31f38 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100127/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> Refreshed view of MusicBrainz tagger
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100127/s/10/
> Wide range diviation example, colors goes from red to green
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100127/s/11/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sergey
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20101102/efb3472f/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list