Proposal: Marking "Work In Progress" explicitly

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 2/11/2010 9:58 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Bart Cerneels <bart.cerneels at kde.org> wrote:
>> It's still better to ask if it was not already clear from general
>> communication that the feature is abandoned. It can also serve as a
>> reminder to the lazy forgetful developer to complete it.
>>
>> And if you end up removing a feature while refactoring, at least make
>> the remove one, simple to revert commit.
> 
> Atomic commits FTW. :D

All commits are atomic.  :-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20100211/9a7c9170/attachment.sig