Proposal: Marking "Work In Progress" explicitly

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 02/11/2010 08:16 AM, Bart Cerneels wrote:
>> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> // THIS CLASS IS WORK IN PROGRESS. Please do not touch for now.
>> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> People who remove code that at first glance is abandoned should check
> with the author or this list. If this does not happen it's a social
> problem that needs fixed at the source.

Agreed. Looking at that header above would simply make me wonder whether
the code is abandoned or actually a work in progress. Like basically any
other code in Amarok  :-)

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20100211/05ecf672/attachment.sig