Version Number of Upcoming Release

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 2/9/2010 10:29 AM, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Jeff Mitchell <mitchell at kde.org> wrote:
>> On 2/5/2010 3:13 AM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
>>> Also, for features not making the cut, that would be a strong +1 for
>>> the "next branch" as proposed previously...
>>
>> Except that IIRC the majority was against the "next branch" idea.
> 
> That's already solved. We don't need an official "next" branch. I can
> do it in some clone, and all interested developers could get access.
> 
> This way, it's completely optional, and everyone can do what suits
> their workflow best, I would say.

Yes. That's how I thought it got solved too.

One thing that *is* key is making other developers aware of what it is
you're developing in your feature branch.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20100209/1818333b/attachment.sig