The unit tests architecture

[Maximilian Kossick]

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ian Monroe <ian.monroe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Nathan Sala <sala.nathan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2010/1/31 Ian Monroe <ian.monroe at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Nathan Sala <sala.nathan at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Thank you Leo,
>>> >
>>> > This code is really helpful for us!
>>> >
>>> > Anyway, are some people willing to comment a global unit tests
>>> > system refactoring in Amarok?
>>> >
>>>
>>> What do you mean?
>>>
>>> The unit test code is currently quite broken, it doesn't even compile
>>> under linux. :/ But I'm not sure it needs a 'refactor'... it just
>>> needs to be fixed and have tests added to it.
>>
>> What do you mean "broken"? I can compile and run unit tests under Linux.
>
> I meant what I said, it didn't compile for me last I tried. I'll try
> it again later today.

If not it might be helpful for somebody who is actually running Linux to fix it.

>
>> The system  has recently been sensibly improved by Rick W. Chen,
>> but it is still quite primitive. Create a test requires to modify several
>> files,
>> one of which is App.cpp in several portions of code. Maybe he could share
>> his point of view?
>>
>> QTestLib is a convenient framework we could totally use.
>
> Don't we already use it?

Yes we do.

>
>> One other idea is to make automatic the execution of the html generator.
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>