langstr at gmail.com
Mon Apr 26 10:58:32 CEST 2010
Mark Kretschmann wrote:
>> On 04/26/2010 08:58 AM, Bart Cerneels wrote:
>>> I think this is pretty useless feature creep.
> Some things should be integrated properly (with a BitTorrent library,
> certainly not by calling some binary), or not done at all.
virt res shr
361m 55m 22m firefox
1026m 114m 45m amarok
I don't need Amarok on Commodore 64, but this is getting a bit much, no?
Feature lovers: Your challenge for 2.4, should you choose to accept it,
is to *halve* Amarok's startup memory size and startup time for people
who use few funky features (Wikipedia lookups, Internet sources,
scripts, BitTorrent, etc.)
I suppose that means on-demand 'dlopen()' and 'dlsym()'.
More information about the Amarok-devel