2.3.1 or 2.4

[Dan Meltzer]

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Leo Franchi <lfranchi at kde.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Nikolaj Hald Nielsen
> <nhnfreespirit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Abby has created another one of his great videos and uploaded it to
>>> YouTube. It's titled "Amarok 2.3.1 First Look" atm, which got me
>>> thinking if we really want the next version to be 2.3.1 considering
>>> the changes we have in trunk already. Or should we go with 2.4?
>>> Opinions?
>>
>> As I said already when discussing 2.3 vs 2.2.3 I think that making to
>> big a jump in version numbers too often devalues the meaning of
>> version numbers. And since we currently do not have a schedule that
>> pushes out pure bugfix releases, and we have previously decided
>> against going the KDE way (with a branch only for bugfix releases,
>> which for us is the right decision I think) I would definitely go for
>> 2.3.1 this time.
>
>
> +1 from me. Going from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0 devalues the meaning of major
> release numbers, imho.

I think that if we went from 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 it would devalue the
meaning of micro release numbers, we should probably call it
2.3.0.0.0.0.1, just to be safe.

>
> leo
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> leonardo.franchi at tufts.edu         Tufts  University 2010
> leo at kdab.com                                 KDAB (USA), LLC
> lfranchi at kde.org                             The KDE Project
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>