Implementation of the "Custom Tags" Feature
Daniel Dewald
Daniel.Dewald at time-shift.de
Wed Oct 28 23:35:38 CET 2009
On Wednesday, 28. October 2009 22:23:29 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> Two things.
>
> First, there is already a "labels" table that should be used for this
> purpose (schema modified if necessary) instead of leaving it fallow and
> creating yet another one. Labels is probably better anyways, since tags
> has a lot of connotations already with music files.
Makes sense. As far as I see it I wouldn't even have to change the Database
much (which I like very much). Any hints on how this table is used in amarok
at the moment? because my labels table is empty.
> I would also highly suggest that you link tags/labels to the urls table,
> not the tracks table. The tracks table is frequently wiped out, whereas
> the urls table keeps its data between scans (just like, presumably,
> labels/tags). You could of course easily make a query to the DB to only
> fetch urls associated with a label for which there is a currently valid
> track associated with that url.
>
Good suggestion. I'll do that.
--
Time-Shift Entertainment
Daniel Dewald
Im Ginselt 8
66709 Weiskirchen
https://www.time-shift.de/
Zertifikat:
https://www.time-shift.de/Certificates/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3063 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20091028/84f20f20/attachment.p7s
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list