Patch for the repaint issue in the collection dialog
Alex Merry
kde at randomguy3.me.uk
Tue Mar 31 19:45:43 CEST 2009
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 01:32:36 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> >>> And adding your name doesn't create the licensing issue. Adding
> >>> copyrightable code gives you a copyright whether you list your name or
> >>> not.
>
> Does it? This doesn't make much sense from the perspective of the rule
> of thumb we've always used, and which Seb stated:
Yes. Copyright is inherent in the creation under international copyright law
(some treaty or other I can't remember the name of). What exactly constitutes
copyrightable work, however, is a bit of a hazy area, and the courts are
forever tweaking it. And the yardstick is almost certainly different in
different countries.
I believe the rule about whether work is copyrightable basically revolves
around whether it involved any creativity. A significant new algorithm is
certainly copyrightable. A set of stubs for an already-defined header
probably isn't. In between... well, people are paid a lot of money to argue
about that.
The copyright tag at the top of files is informative. Removing the line
doesn't not remove a person's copyright claim on that work. The lines are
there so that people who want to (re-)license the work know who to contact.
As such, I would say always err on the side of adding copyright lines. From a
legal point of view, it's better to obtain the permission of someone who
doesn't hold a copyright than not to obtain the permission of someone who does
when relicensing a work.
Standard disclaimer: IANAL. Just interested in such issues. Do not take my
word: if you care about this issue, research it yourself.
Alex
--
Why have I got six monitors? Because I haven't got room for eight.
-- Terry Pratchett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20090331/9e5456ac/attachment.sig
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list