SFC advice on our "board"

[Mark Kretschmann]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Seb Ruiz <me at sebruiz.net> wrote:
> 2009/2/5 Jeff Mitchell <mitchell at kde.org>:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I just got a response back from the SFC in regards to our application.
>> One thing they pointed out that everyone should be aware of is the
>> following:
>>
>> ***Begin quote***
>>
>>> We are going through an election process of board members internally.
>>> Once that is complete, one or two of the board members will be the
>>> Amarok P.O.C.(s) with the Conservancy.
>>
>> Yeah, that sounds fine, although it's probably better to pick a name
>> other than "board members".  This is because Conservancy's Board of
>> Directors will effectively be the "Board" for the non-profit existence
>> of Amarok if/when it becomes a member of Conservancy.  Pretty much any
>> word that isn't a non-profit buzzword already should be fine.
>> Committee, leadership council, anything like that.
>>
>> ***End quote***
>>
>> So, at some point we will need to decide on another name for what we've
>> generally been referring to as the board.
>
> oooh oooh, let's vote!

Lol. I concur, and expand on that: Let's vote on the voting!

PS: Don't vote this mail down please. It'd drive me to tears.

-- 
Mark Kretschmann
Amarok Developer
www.kde.org - amarok.kde.org