SFC advice on our "board"

[Jeff Mitchell]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I just got a response back from the SFC in regards to our application.
One thing they pointed out that everyone should be aware of is the
following:

***Begin quote***

> We are going through an election process of board members internally.
> Once that is complete, one or two of the board members will be the
> Amarok P.O.C.(s) with the Conservancy.

Yeah, that sounds fine, although it's probably better to pick a name
other than "board members".  This is because Conservancy's Board of
Directors will effectively be the "Board" for the non-profit existence
of Amarok if/when it becomes a member of Conservancy.  Pretty much any
word that isn't a non-profit buzzword already should be fine.
Committee, leadership council, anything like that.

***End quote***

So, at some point we will need to decide on another name for what we've
generally been referring to as the board.

- --Jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmKWDgACgkQANYdqNCuGCVNTgCg32sRXqmWBUQ/TrVi1D0Vfc7z
sFYAoIEAemWCMsA4CqpQbaDxvnVWOLzQ
=qCb9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----