next step for testing was Re: GSoC Status Update August/3

Jeff Mitchell mitchell at kde.org
Tue Aug 18 03:53:34 CEST 2009


Seb Ruiz wrote:
> 2009/8/18 Ian Monroe <ian.monroe at gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Sven Krohlas<sven at asbest-online.de> wrote:
>>> So in the end we have a fast test framework with currently
>>> 18 test classes. Adding more tests is not hard, a guide to
>>> using and writing Amarok unit tests has just been added our
>>> wiki. Tell me if anything is unclear there:
>>>
>>>  http://amarok.kde.org/wiki/Unit_Testing
>> I always felt the important thing for this GSoC was that the system
>> get put into place to start making testing a normal part of Amarok
>> development. Sven has done the coding side of that (makes sense, it is
>> GSo*C*), now we need infrastructure.
>>
>> We need to have continuous testing so that people can be notified when
>> their commit caused a test failure. I think making it very clear and
>> public whats going on with tests will encourage us to maintain and
>> expand the tests, since it will be quite useful then.
>>
>> I can volunteer to help setup a post-update trigger on the server, the
>> way I did for the commit emails. But thats really an easy part. ;)
>> Kollide is busy enough already, so we need a volunteer server or
>> sysadmin I suppose. And then we need some software to run the
>> continuous testing... if only we knew some guy who worked a company
>> that did that. :P
> 
> I'll ask around :)

I can do it. At least for a while. I can give people login/sudo access
as well, so we're not reliant on just one person to keep it going.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20090817/101ccce3/attachment.sig 


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list