Release naming

[Lydia Pintscher]

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 14:46, Greg Meyer <greg at gkmeyer.com> wrote:
> It is an issue for packaging but it's really not that hard to work around, but
> I can see why it would make sense to be consistent with KDE, and I can also
> see that from a packager's perspective it'd be good to have the tarball's
> versioned in a way that I don't have to keep editing my
> specfile/ebuild/pkgbuild/whateverDebiancallsthem in a hackish way.

Exactly :)

> Really, the beta1, beta2, rc1, etc should be emphasized when discussing, but
> to name the tarball 1.9x for easier packaging should really be noticed by no
> one except the packagers.

Which is exactly what I have done so far imho.


-- 
Lydia Pintscher
Amarok community manager
kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
claimid.com/nightrose