Adding tracks to the collection

[Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)]

Is there an API guide for scripters?  I have the link to the amarok 2.0 
scripting guide but I don't see an API documentation there.

El Lunes 20 Octubre 2008, Seb Ruiz escribió:
> 2008/10/21 Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu>:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Seb Ruiz <ruiz at kde.org> wrote:
> >> 2008/10/21 Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu>:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Seb Ruiz <ruiz at kde.org> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Max,
> >>>> I'd like to be able to give scripts access to insert or update tracks
> >>>> into the local sql collection database. My primary reason for doing
> >>>> this is to workaround numerous issues within QtScript combined with
> >>>> QtSql. Essentially, I'd like to be able to do something to the effect
> >>>> of sqlCollection()->insertTrack( url ); and add associated statistical
> >>>> data to that track (playcount, score etc).
> >>>>
> >>>> What is your opinion on exposing this sort of functionality? If you're
> >>>> okay with that, what would be the best implementation?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Seb
> >>>
> >>> I really can't imagine any other script ever needing to do this. So to
> >>> me that means either you should rethink having it be a script at all or
> >>> it means that you shouldn't worry about making the API clean, since its
> >>> essentially an internal API. So do whatever makes implementation easy.
> >>
> >> Sure, perhaps not, unless we want to allow third part scripts to build
> >> collections (bad idea perhaps). Eg, importers from arbitrary (iTunes,
> >> rythymbox collections etc)
> >
> > Actually I think enabling this is a very cool idea. :)
> >
> >> The QtScript bindings that we have don't expose the Meta objects to
> >> scripts.
> >
> > This isn't true. They are available via the playlist manipulation
> > stuff. You can even edit tags. Collections aren't really exposed at
> > all though.
>
> Really - wow I must have overlooked this.


-- 

	Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o at rudd-o.com>
	Rudd-O.com - http://rudd-o.com/
	GPG key ID 0xC8D28B92 at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/

But like the Good Book says... There's BIGGER DEALS to come!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20081020/d813041a/attachment.sig