item for discussion: internal bug tracker/todo system

[Lydia Pintscher]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 19:29, Gregory Meyer <greg at gkmeyer.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Lydia Pintscher
> <lydia.pintscher at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 18:02, Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyways that's my idea. People should talk about it with each other at
>>> aKademy and decide if its any good or not. :) Let me know if something
>>> doesn't make sense.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>
>> Your idea is good but not with a second bug tracker!
>> We already have one and abusing one as a todo list will lead to no good.
>> We need a todo software. So let's get one.
>> Can someone look into groupware solutions?
>>
>> Also let us first have a look at the new bugzilla and how much it
>> improves the situation.
>>
> I have always been kind of impressed with flyspray as a task
> tracker/to-do list rather than a pure bug tracker.  In fact, i believe
> they even refer to items as tasks in the software as opposed to bugs.
>
> I do think a bug tracker is appropriate since we need to do far more
> than keep a list of items.  If you just replace the word bug with task
> it becomes appropriate.
>
> Just my 2 cents.


Yes we need more than a list of items.
We need a real task tracker.
This includes stuff like "% done", "due date", "repeats" and "time estimation".
Especially for promo this would be really helpful. A bug tracker
doesn't offer this.


Cheers
Lydia

-- 
Lydia Pintscher
Amarok community manager
kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
claimid.com/nightrose