Why do we use WMA instead of ASF?

[Harald Sitter]

Am Montag 19 November 2007 18:38:49 schrieb Martin Aumueller:
> We use wma because it was named that we when we originally retrieved it
> from upstream.
>
> It should not be difficult at all to change that. But we should probably
> only maintain one copy of the taglib extension code for Amarok 2.0 and 1.4,
> as having cmake and automake build instructions in the same source tree is
> perfectly possible. Otherwise we would have to keep 2 copies up to date.

I'm not all for renaming the extension in 1.4 anyway. 

See http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stable#Adjective for the reason of this.

-- 
Harald Sitter
Amarok team        Project Manager         Mail: harald at getamarok.com
amarok.kde.org     Good news everyone!     Jabber: apachelogger at kdetalk.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20071119/40aa1ee0/attachment.pgp