last.fm as a service?

[Casey Link]

There are other UI considerations to think about too, for example
where will the Love/Ban buttons go? And when tagging is implemented, I
assume that will be an option where amarok 1.4 has tags now (in the
properties dialog).

So some last.fm stuff won't really be confined to the service browser.

Casey

On Dec 11, 2007 12:11 PM, Nikolaj Hald Nielsen <nhnfreespirit at gmail.com> wrote:
> > LastFm streams should really be just another radio stream type in the
> > playlist browser, like it is currently in 1.4. Like you can add a
> > radio station with a URL or you can add a LastFm stream with a
> > lastfm:// URL or with a dialog to help you construct a lastfm:// URL.
> > They would be implemented as subclasses of Meta::Track.
>
> Thats the thing, I don't really like the radio stream being in the
> playlist browser either. I think the a service could easilly be used
> to store any number of streams that the user defines, as well as some
> of the predefined ones.
>
> - Nikolaj
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>