branches merged and tag

[Vishesh Handa]

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer <colomar at autistici.org>wrote:

> On Wednesday 03 April 2013 18:10:55 Marco Martin wrote:
>
> > > I don't object to the branches merged, but I do object to the tagging
> > > unless these two bugs are fixed:
> > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317460
>

This seems like a packaging problem


> > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316158
>

This seems like an inotify problem, cause if the file indexer is picking
them up on restart indexing is working perfectly.

Possible solutions -

1. Check intofiy limit and see if it is too low by monitoring the debug
output of `nepomukservicestub nepomukfilewatch`
2. Try creating a new file in an indexed directory and see if the filewatch
service mentions it


> > >
> > > Nepomuk-based media browsing is useless if we don't have metadata in
> > > Nepomuk, and if people copy/download files to their devices but they do
> > > not show up anywhere, they would be very irritated.
> > > Plus, fileTypeUI could not be tested yet without the information being
> > > available in Nepomuk.
> >
> > shouldn't depend from something in the plasma-mobile repository(the one
> > being tagged).
>
> Ah yes, true. So the only thing is that the meta data filters in Files
> could
> not be tested yet. Have you been able to test them locally with correctly
> indexed music or video files?
>

Weirdly enough, you should be able to filter by types (Image, Audio, Video)
even if taglib is not present cause the first stage indexing is responsible
for picking up the mimetype.


> > anyways, i don't really know what to do to those two problems, it will
> need
> > more investigating.
> >
> > it has to be either in nepomuk-core or any of its dependencies
>
> While they may not affect the actual plasma-mobile code, they do affect PA
> as a
> product (i.e. our full images), so it's important that we get it fixed
> before
> the actual release images are built.
> Maybe Vishesh has an idea?
>
>
Both of these work perfectly for me right now, and I haven't received any
bug reports for 4.10 which indicate otherwise.


-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20130404/a350907b/attachment.html>