Proposal: Plasma Active Three end of August

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Friday, September 14, 2012 22:05:20 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> The blockers definitely have to be fixed before we can release. I would
> definitely not recommend releasing with the major problems still there,
> since it would make us look bad, but they at least leave PA in a usable
> state.

2 bits of input here:

a) we don't need the editorial to convince why we should no release with 
"release blockers". :) Let's all just agree that "release blocker" means what 
it says and then decide on an issue-by-issue basis if that issue is a blocker.

b) these should be in a fresh thread for blockers; i'd like to see such a 
thread on the list at this point in every release cycle so we can collect 
issues for killing in an easy to find spot. i'll send an email shortly.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20120918/0114dec7/attachment.sig>