Re: Re: kwin vs kwinactive

[Thomas Lübking]

On Dienstag, 30. Oktober 2012 19:42:46 CEST, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Monday 29 October 2012 21:50:47 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On Monday, October 29, 2012 21:11:32 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>>> On Monday 29 October 2012 20:54:49 Marco Martin wrote:
>>>> hi all,
>>>> i seen that when kwin is built as "kwinactive" executable it takes its
>>>> config from kwinactiverc, but the rules are still taken from
>>>> kwinrulesrc,
>>>> shouldn't it be kwinactiverulesrc as well? (to have different sets, ie
>>>> one
>>>> would want the fullscreen prevention only on kwinactive)
>>> 
>>> we currently do not ship any rules for active and given that the kcm is
>>> not
>>> compiled for kwinactive, I am not sure whether it is needed.
>> 
>> Marco wrote his email because we are probably going to be 
>> shipping rules for
>> active; we ran into an issue with applications written for Nemo where
>> things are done a bit differently. i'm guessing that's what motivated his
>> mail.
> ah yes, then it would make sense to change that part, too. 
> Especially if the rules are useless for the desktop case.

Would we need more generic support here then?
Eg. one might need a rule for plasma-netbook ("yes stupid window, you *can* maximize!") which makes no sense on the desktop at all.

Cheers,
Thomas