kwin vs kwinactive

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Friday 02 November 2012 12:27:39 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > Marco wrote his email because we are probably going to be shipping rules
> > > for active; we ran into an issue with applications written for Nemo
> > > where things are done a bit differently. i'm guessing that's what
> > > motivated his mail.
> > 
> > ah yes, then it would make sense to change that part, too. Especially if
> > the rules are useless for the desktop case.
> 
> so in the end how do we proceed for now?
> in any way to me is fine, using kwinactiverulesrc or kwinrulesrc
if you want to ship rules in active, I think it would make sense to create a 
${KWIN_NAME}rulesrc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20121102/5003d24d/attachment.sig>