[Nepomuk] porting stuff to Nepomuk2

Vishesh Handa me at vhanda.in
Wed Jul 11 14:19:30 UTC 2012


On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 11 July 2012, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yo all,
> > > I tried to port some stuff to Nepomuk2, namely kactivities and
> > > plasma-mobile
> > >
> > > porting kactivities went smooth, and is now in the branch mart/nepomuk2
> > > of the
> > > kactivities repository.
> > > the only thing still to fix is that is exposing a Nepomuk::Resource in
> a
> > > method, so it will have to provide both that and a new one with a
> > > Nepomuk2::Resource
> >
> > Why both? Can't everyone just use Nepomuk2::Resource?
>
> is released with kde 4.9 and is a public library -> binary compatibility
> promise
>
> (Ivan: correct me if i am wrong, that should be the only nepomuk symbol
> exported there?)
>
> > >
> > > Vishesh: what's the best way to proceed now?
> >
> > I think for now it would make sense to push your
> > NepomukAddOntologyClasses.cmake in that branch, and then we can merge it
> > into master. I don't want this going into 4.9 cause there are some
> problems
> > with the current rcgen which I would like to fix at some point.
>
> problem is that it is in kdelibs so there is no master.
> it may be added to nepomuk-core, but in this case since kdelibs still has
> to
> have the old one it would be called Nepomuk2AddOntologyClasses
> and use only nepomuk2_rcgen
>
> I'm not sure what is the policy of cmake files, if they should be scattered
> together their framework or if they are still wanted in a single repo
>

I think then in makes sense to have a Nepomuk2AddOntologyClasses which only
uses nepomuk2_rcgen. Cause I don't think the packagers would like us having
2 pacakges (nepomuk-core and kdelibs) install the same cmake file.


>
> > Btw, I don't really understand the NepomukAddOntologyClasses.cmake, so I
> > hope it works :)
>
> seems to work for both nepomuk1 and 2 cases, the issue is more where tp put
> the thing ;)
>
> --
> Marco Martin
>



-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20120711/904cafca/attachment.html>


More information about the Active mailing list