qml screenlocker, again

[Marco Martin]

On Tuesday 21 August 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > i think the timeout is still (partly) governed by the screensaver
> > timeout, so without that kcm wouldn't make much sense, should be
> > uniquely powermanagement governed timeouts?
> 
> sounds reasonable to move it to powermanagement
> 
> > oh, another thing.. what about widgets on screensaver? is something that
> > we really want to keep?
> 
> should still work, IIRC I adjusted it. Personally I would like to have it
> as the default, but it's too slow in loading.

yeah, i see.
when asked to close the locker from the toolbox, it seems to try to load its 
own piece of qml for authentication (going to a black screen, btw)

doesn't this leads to a potential duplicated implementation of the whole 
greeter?

-- 
Marco Martin