Active/Two stable branches

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday, December 15, 2011 19:27:32 Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FCgler?= 
wrote:
> These branches should be safe to pull from at any time to create packages. I
> don't think it makes a lot of sense to ship stable updates as tarball
> packages, but it would still be nice to pass on the bugfixes we make to
> existing users. We can tag known working combinations as Active/2.1,
> Active/2.2 still, to make it a bit easier to find "known working tested"
> versions.

do we have the capacity to maintain and make releases out of such a branch?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20111215/2f005724/attachment.sig>