<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 22/02/2024 à 17:58, José Marcio
Martins da Cruz a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7742673f-be6b-4f78-b83d-52bf077b9457@gmail.com">On
2/22/24 17:40, Eric wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hello,
<br>
<br>
I started using Tellico (among others) to classify videos and
podcasts on the internet using a field for URLs.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
That's simpler.
<br>
<br>
When I go to a bookstore, sometimes I need to check if a book I'm
thinking to buy I don't have it already... ;-) So, the web pages
need to be consultable in a smartphone.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I also thought to write a script to use
the data saved in Tellico (probably in CSV) to generate a static
website....
<br>
:)
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
A static site is better and easier to do. The only reason to use a
CMS software is to be able to render in a smartphone display.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><b><font color="#169179">Even in a static site you may manage to
have it working on smartphones too :)</font></b></p>
<p><b><font color="#169179">I've already done a script to make
static sites (rendered in smartphones too) with data on a json
file (on my computer + ftp ) : an exemple <a
href="https://ericrogergarcia.legtux.org/a/stopthalassostatique/">here</a>
(it is a test).</font></b></p>
<p><b><font color="#169179">I used <a
href="https://processing.org/">Processing</a> for this<br>
</font></b></p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7742673f-be6b-4f78-b83d-52bf077b9457@gmail.com">
<br>
The interest of directly use the *.tc file instead of csv dump is
that you don't need to do manual operations like launching
tellico, dumping it and launching an external script to do the
job.</blockquote>
<p><b><font color="#169179">Maybe I'll use the xml format, I'm going
to choose when I'll make the script !</font></b><br>
</p>
<p><font color="#169179"><b>I should have the time for making it in
about a month.</b></font></p>
<p><font color="#169179"><b>I'll write another messages here then</b></font></p>
<p><font color="#169179"><b>:)</b></font><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7742673f-be6b-4f78-b83d-52bf077b9457@gmail.com"> If it's
ok for you, why not ?
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<br>
Le 22/02/2024 à 16:23, José Marcio Martins da Cruz a écrit :
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<br>
Hello,
<br>
<br>
I've thinking about this... and I'll probably do something.
<br>
<br>
I consider the HTML export just something to help create a
minimal page. Don't expect too much as tellico is already very
good to manage collections.
<br>
<br>
The downside of tellico generating HTML pages, IMHO, are :
<br>
* it takes too long (I have a collection of around 2000
books);
<br>
* It generates a generic web page - not well suited to
smartphones;
<br>
* it takes too long to do search on smartphones - I think it's
related to javascript, so it's faster to use the navigator
search tool.
<br>
<br>
What I'm thinking it's better is an external tool to handle
the tellico database - it's just a zip compressed XML file -
extract wanted information and inject it into some kind of CMS
software (wordpress, ...).
<br>
<br>
For the moment, I've only digged into tellico database file
format and it's just an idea on how I'd like to do that.
<br>
<br>
Regards,
<br>
<br>
José-Marcio
<br>
<br>
On 2/22/24 11:42, Eric wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hello,
<br>
<br>
<br>
Would someone have worked on scripts to use Tellico data to
make a website?
<br>
<br>
(I saw that Tellico allows an export in html.I wonder if
there are scripts to improve this kind of use).
<br>
<br>
:)
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>