<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Stephen Kelly <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steveire@gmail.com">steveire@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Scott Kitterman wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Monday, May 30, 2011 10:32:57 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:<br>
>> CC'ing release-team and kde-pim back. The people who can properly answer<br>
>> these concerns are not subscribed to kde-packager.<br>
>><br>
>> Raymond Wooninck <<a href="mailto:tittiatcoke@gmail.com">tittiatcoke@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
>> > On Monday 30 May 2011 09:40:46 Scott Kitterman wrote:<br>
>> >> On Monday, May 30, 2011 09:35:54 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:<br>
>> >> > CC'ing kde-packager.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Stephen Kelly <<a href="mailto:steveire@gmail.com">steveire@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
>> >> > > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:<br>
>> >> > >> Speaking of SDO, last time I asked about the right version to use<br>
>> >> > >> I saw the issue was discussed on kde-core-devel and kde-pim, but<br>
>> >> > >> no definitive answer was given to kde-packager. Could you please<br>
>> >> > >> summarize the final answer for us?<br>
>> >> > ><br>
>> >> > > As far as I know, the rcgen code generator in kdelibs master has<br>
>> >> > > been<br>
>> >> > > changed to generate code that does not break kdepim < 4.7, even<br>
>> >> > > after the changes introduced in SDO 0.7.<br>
>> >> > ><br>
>> >> > > I didn't try it myself since then.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > OK, so KDE SC 4.7 will require SDO 0.7, but will work fine with<br>
>> >> > kdepim <= 4.7; KDE SC < 4.7 requires SDO 0.6, which also works fine<br>
>> >> > with kdepim <= 4.7?<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> I hope kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 both work with SDO 0.6 or 0.7 (pick<br>
>> >> one) as we can't use one version for some packages and another for<br>
>> >> others.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > What I know from Trueg is that kdelibs 4.7 has a hard requirement for<br>
>> > SDO<br>
>> > 0.7. This due to recent changes in kdelibs 4.7. I know that kdepim in<br>
>> > master has been changed to work with SDO 0.7, but I am not sure if<br>
>> > these changes ar backwards compatible.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > So I am afraid that kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 are currently a NO-GO<br>
>> > combination. (unless kdepim 4.6 has been changed to work with SDO 0.7).<br>
>><br>
>> From what I see, rcgen in kdelibs master (upcoming 4.7) has been patched<br>
>> so that kdepim < 4.7 also works with it, so it's not a NO-GO.<br>
><br>
> I guess the question is has it (kdelibs) been changed to work with SDO<br>
> 0.6? If both work with SDO 0.6, then we can stay with that until we get a<br>
> SDO 0.7 compatible kdepim release.<br>
<br>
</div></div>2e1704ddfda6ae53ec2793129f2700601ac6f31b in kdelibs increases the<br>
requirement there to SDO 0.7. I don't know why. Sebastian Trueg would have<br>
to answer that and tell you what it would take to revert.<br>
<br>
As far as I know, kdepim 4.6 and kdepim 4.7 are SDO 0.7 compatible. Has<br>
anyone confirmed the opposite? If both are not 0.7 compatible then that has<br>
to be fixed and nobody knows about it.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO 0.7. If no one </div><div>objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Let me know</div></div><br>-- <br><font color="#999999">Vishesh Handa</font><br>