Should I wait for someone else to need it or move it already?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David Faure <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:faure@kde.org">faure@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Monday 23 March 2009, David Faure wrote:<br>
> On Friday 20 March 2009, Aleix Pol wrote:<br>
> > After some chat between John and me, we decided that, since KFormula might<br>
> > want to use this QtMMLWidget code at some point but we want that KDE<br>
> > applications start to take advantage of MathML as soon as possible.<br>
> > Our idea has been to put it to kdesupport until KFormula has forked it (and<br>
> > it is working) so that we can deprecate the QtSolution's in kdesupport. Then<br>
> > KFormula's widget would go to kdelibs.<br>
> ><br>
> > Is that ok?<br>
><br>
> Sounds ok. Mark clearly the kdesupport code as "do not use in your kde app"<br>
> then. Not only because of SIC and BIC (which would be expected anyway<br>
> until it's released) but because it will even go away once libkformula is done...<br>
<br>
</div>The alternative, of course, is to do all this in a work branch and commit the result<br>
directly to kdereview for kdelibs. Depends if you expect to be done before 4.3 or not,<br>
in fact: if yes then it doesn't make much difference and working in trunk saves<br>
from regular merges; if no then working in a work branch prevents temporary classes<br>
(and even a temporary lib) being released at 4.3 time.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
David Faure, <a href="mailto:faure@kde.org">faure@kde.org</a>, sponsored by Qt Software @ Nokia to work on KDE,<br>
Konqueror (<a href="http://www.konqueror.org" target="_blank">http://www.konqueror.org</a>), and KOffice (<a href="http://www.koffice.org" target="_blank">http://www.koffice.org</a>).<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>